Big Brother watched. Soma numbed. Our smartphones do both. What can Orwell and Huxley teach us about reclaiming digital autonomy?
- Marcus Nikos
- May 4
- 4 min read

Digital Seduction Silently Undermines Our Power and Influence
It’s time to break out of our digital stupor and harness technology for good.
KEY POINTS
In dystopian novels Brave New World and 1984, the state disempowered citizens. Now our phones do the same.
Algorithm-driven content is emotionally manipulative by design.
It steals the space we need for deep thinking, reflection, and real self-determination.
Thoughtful tech use and active critical thinking can help us break free and reclaim our power and influence.
Today’s digital world surrounds us with smartphones, streaming services, and social media that promise to simplify life. As the writer behind the Psychology Today blog "Power and Influence," my usual focus is on expanding personal strength and strategic thinking. In this post, however, I explore a different side of the story—how technology’s seductive features may be quietly eroding our influence and autonomy.
In my previous post, I explored how reading fiction can sharpen our emotional intelligence and deepen our empathy. Now, I turn to two legendary novels—Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and George Orwell's 1984—whose chilling visions of dystopia feel eerily relevant today. These stories don't just captivate; they challenge us to reflect on the forces shaping our world, from technological dominance to threats against individuality. Today’s article delves into their timeless warnings and urgent significance in understanding the complexities of modern life.
Digital platforms are built to offer highly personalized experiences, where every encounter is designed to capture our attention. These systems tap into our brain’s natural reward mechanisms, giving us small bursts of pleasure that keep us coming back for more. However, while this immediate gratification is appealing, it also steals the time and mental energy we need for critical thought and self-determination. Rather than being neutral tools for our benefit, our digital devices now often serve as a continuous distraction that narrows our focus to fleeting updates.
Dystopian Warnings Revisited: From Brave New World to 1984
Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” introduced the idea of soma, a drug used to pacify society by dulling the senses and suppressing dissent. In today’s world, our digital devices fulfill a similar role. The constant stream of notifications, curated images, and instant rewards creates a cycle that can leave us more distracted than enlightened. Every swipe and click triggers a small surge of dopamine-induced satisfaction, keeping us locked in a cycle of immediate gratification that mirrors the numbing effect of soma.
George Orwell’s “1984” warned us of a society where constant surveillance undermines freedom, stripping away personal autonomy. Modern technology, with its drive for data collection and analysis, is bringing us closer to that dystopian reality. Detailed tracking systems monitor our online behavior, collecting data that shapes the ads we see and the information we consume. GPS tracking, which most people can’t or don’t disable, follows us around, facilitating highly targeted, geo-based ads and contributing to the wealth of information marketers hold on each of us. This extensive monitoring influences decisions in ways that are often invisible, making the freedom we think we have seem like an illusion.
article continues after advertisement
The Social Architecture of Division: Echo Chambers and Fragmentation
Adding to the challenge is the way technology contributes to social division. Social media platforms are built to grab our attention by prioritizing content that sparks strong emotions. In doing so, they often push us into echo chambers where our existing beliefs are mirrored back at us, isolating us from different perspectives. When people only encounter ideas they already agree with, they become more entrenched and open to manipulation. This environment not only weakens collective understanding but also chips away at the potential for broad, inclusive community engagement, leaving us with fragmented views of the world.
The combination of constant distraction and pervasive surveillance creates what might be called a dual mechanism of control. On one hand, digital distractions keep us passively entertained; on the other, the collection and analysis of our data subtly steer our decision-making. The idea that we freely choose our digital experiences is increasingly undermined by carefully designed algorithms that track and shape our behavior. AI will only make algorithms more accurate and powerful.
Reclaiming Agency: Critical Engagement and Ethical Technological Use
There is, however, another side to this story, one where we can reclaim our agency. It starts with fostering a habit of critical thinking: questioning the endless stream of information coming our way and challenging the narratives offered by our devices. Whether through better media literacy in education or through everyday discussions that push us to look beyond the surface, cultivating skepticism can help break the cycle of passive consumption. This isn’t just a theoretical exercise. It’s a practical step toward ensuring that our digital lives enhance rather than restrict our personal power.
It’s also important to remember that technology itself is neutral. When used responsibly, it can be a powerful tool for good. Digital platforms can democratize learning, give us new ways to verify information, and even foster empathy by connecting us with diverse perspectives. When technology is applied with care and ethical intent, it has the potential to catalyze positive change, driving more inclusive civic engagement and more informed decision-making.
The challenges posed by our digital environment call for fresh thinking in policy and digital ethics. We need transparent algorithms, robust data protection laws, and a commitment to digital democracy to ensure that personal autonomy isn’t sacrificed for convenience. How can future policies and open-algorithm practices rebalance the scales between innovation and independent thought? The answer might lie in multi-disciplinary efforts that bring together experts from psychology, ethics, sociology, and technology studies. By doing so, we can forge a path that keeps technology as a tool for empowerment rather than one for subtle control.
article continues after advertisement
Conclusion
The digital seduction that fills our everyday lives is not an unavoidable fate. Just as Huxley and Orwell warned us of the dangers of manipulated societies, their visions serve as reminders that reclaiming our mental space and personal power is within reach. By embracing thoughtful skepticism, demanding transparency from tech companies, and prioritizing ethical digital practices, we can turn technology into a force that empowers us rather than restricts us. The challenge is to enjoy the benefits of digital innovation while preserving the capacity for deep, independent thought.